The Nfl Hates the Saints and They Will Never Let Them Make the Super Bowl Ever Again

Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images

On February 4, three days prior to Super Basin XLIV, ESPN.com posted a poll asking this question of its readers: Of the 18 quarterbacks who accept won simply one Super Bowl, which was the best?  The unusual part of this poll question?  Drew Brees' proper name was already on that list.

As written on the NBC-partnered Profootballtalk.com on Saturday the 6th, quoting from the ESPN.com poll question:  "Afterwards completing the best season in New Orleans Saints history, Drew Brees has finally won his first Super Bowl. Brees' solitary Super Bowl victory puts him on an eclectic list of starting quarterbacks with i title to their names. From all-time greats like Brett Favre to large personalities like Jim McMahon, 18 men have started and won pro football's biggest game but once in their careers..."

It would exist quite like shooting fish in a barrel to dismiss this every bit a simple mistake on ESPN's part. The poll may accept been like the Indianapolis Colts' hats and t-shirts pre-printed prior to Sunday declaring them Super Basin champions. Perchance the poll question, possibly written in anticipation of the decision of Super Bowl XLIV, was accidentally posted on its website. Possibly Brees' name wasn't meant to exist included. Possibly some ESPN lackey was having a bit of fun.

All of this may be well and truthful. Yet equally the poll question made the rounds online prior to kickoff, ESPN quickly yanked the offending poll from its website. All links to it (and at that place were enough, including profootballtalk.com'southward and 1 on cbssports.com) were directed to ESPN'southward homepage.

The conspiracy theory had begun:  ESPN knew the Saints would win.

Crazy or not, the poll question predicted the hereafter quite accurately.  For myself, information technology's not crazy.  I practice not believe the NFL is every bit it claims to be.  I believe the league fixes the outcomes of their ain games for Idiot box ratings and the billions of dollars of turn a profit attached to them. And I'm not lonely.

Super Bowl XLIV may but exist a instance in indicate.  The ratings were certainly in that location. Aided by the snowstorm that bedridden part of the due east coast, Sunday'southward game was the near watched football game ever, giving the NFL its highest television ratings in its history. In fact, it was the most watched programme in U.S. tv history.

The NFL's partner on Sunday, CBS, was a winner too.  Besides raking in $3 million for each 30-2nd commercial, CBS and its advertising partners were quite happy to see a tightly played game non exist determined until well into the fourth quarter. Keeping the fans at home glued to their Television receiver's as long as possible is exactly what CBS would hope for.  Much like last year's Steelers-Cardinals Super Bowl, their wish seemed to be the NFL's command.

But what about the game itself?

Many pundits, fans, and armchair commentators accept dissected the stats and come up to their ain conclusions. Some indicate to the surprise on-side kicking recovered by the Saints as a turning point which led to New Orleans first-always title. Some see the Saints outscoring the Colts 31-7 after the outset quarter equally a sign of their dominance in the game.

Others point to Peyton Manning's fourth quarter interception that was returned for a touchdown as the game-clincher. They say that single throw once again proved Manning "can't win the big i," despite his otherwise impressive stat-line for the game (and his own previously won Super Basin band).

It is my stance that Manning was tapped to lose the game on purpose at the NFL'due south asking.

(I will land right now that I am neither a Manning fan nor a Colts fan, and what follows is simply my stance and observations, zero more than).

Prior to the kickoff of Super Basin XLIV, as CBS showed the players on both teams going through their pregame warm-ups, Peyton Manning looked aroused. Some would claim he had his "game face" on, merely to me, that was non a wait of determination or concentration but of anger.

After kickoff and as the game progressed, Manning yet never looked himself. He continued to look equally if he had some sort of result, and not necessarily due to the score. I've seen Manning and the Colts play several times over the years, and the Peyton Manning I saw pre-game and on the sidelines Dominicus was not your typical Manning.

Why was he angry?  Well, if you were told to accept a dive in the Super Bowl, you might non be besides jolly yourself.

In the first quarter, Manning and the Colts offense looked their usual cocky - two drives, 2 scores and a x-0 lead. In the second quarter, the Colts only had 2 more possessions, both of which were three-and-outs.

In one case they got the ball dorsum in Manning's hands in the third quarter after the Saints took a 13-10 pb off the on-side kicking, Manning once once again drove the Colts down the field and re-took the lead.  The next bulldoze, Manning did more than of the same, setting the team upwardly for a long field goal to pad their ane-point lead.  Matt Stover's 51-yard effort, however, would fail.

The Saints seized upon the opportunity, and afterwards the controversial two-point conversion gave them a 24-17 advantage, some wondered if the NFL had already picked its champion (some Colts fans would also wonder about the referees' preference in the game every bit well.  Outside of kickoffs, not a single offensive holding phone call was fabricated nor a defensive pass interference penalization assessed on either side).

Later on the ensuing kickoff gave the Colts the ball at their own xxx-g line (a false start penalty quickly pushed them back to the 25), Manning drove the Colts to the Saints' 31-yard line in but half dozen plays.  The usual Peyton Manning appeared to be at piece of work.

Then, on third-and-five, Manning made the error that gave the Saints the game. The inception - the alone turnover in the game - was not a typical Manning pass. Manning locked on to Reggie Wayne from the snap. He never looked off him.

While Wayne ran his curlicue-in route, Manning should accept easily spotted Tracy Porter sitting inside Wayne. Despite Porter'due south immediate presence, Manning threw the laissez passer in Wayne's direction. For once, Manning wasn't accurrate. His ball was further inside than Wayne and made for an easy on-the-run catch for Porter which led to the touchdown.

The question is did Manning purposefully throw the pick to give the Saints the win? I believe he very well may accept.

Information technology is without a doubt the NFL has been pro-New Orleans since Hurricane Katrina destroyed the urban center. The NFL has been quick to link the rebuilt Saints (which merely so happened to become revitalized at the same time the Superdome was in 2006 every bit the Saints reached the NFC Championship Game) with the rebuilt urban center. The league wants fans nationwide to believe the city of New Orleans rallies effectually what were once the 'Aints, and that the team is in fact responsible for the city's "return to glory."

Considering that the NFL and Saints owner Tom Benson only paid somewhere between 10-fifteen% of the Superdome's rebuilding costs, this is pure spin.

Calculation to that propaganda, Drew Brees has been deemed New Orleans' conquering hero despite beingness built-in in Austin, TX, playing college ball at Purdue, and playing half his career in San Diego. Brees is now plainly as Nawlins as Bourbon Street.

Peyton Manning, on the other hand, has true links to New Orleans. He was built-in there. And his father Archie was possibly the Saints best known and loved quarterback until this past Sun.

Could Manning have given back to his home city by giving away the game?

After the interception, Manning still led the Colts right back down the field, from the Colts' 14 to the Saints three in just five plays.  There, with barely a glimmer of promise remaining, Reggie Wayne let a touchdown laissez passer skid through his fingers on 4th down to ensure New Orleans had its starting time title in 41 years.

Manning unceremoniously ran off the field without congratulating any of the Saints. He claimed it was because the "field was New Orleans" so, and having learned from his own Super Bowl victory just three years prior, the losers demand non become in the way.

Was it truly that, or was Manning besides upset to put on a fake smile?  Was the seeming acrimony that began his Lord's day the same that consumed him when the concluding gun sounded?

Manning has had his rewards. He has his multi-million dollar contract, his four MVPs, his ain Super Bowl ring, and a bust waiting for him in Canton. Volition this loss bear on his legacy? Not in the least.

And that may exist exactly why he'd lose a simple football game game. Perhaps he knows how football in the NFL is played. And information technology'southward not as the fans believe.

For more, visit:  www.thefixisin.cyberspace

villegasnals2002.blogspot.com

Source: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/342354-did-peyton-manning-help-the-nfl-fix-super-bowl-xliv-for-the-saints

Share this post